top of page
Writer's pictureeditor@Kamal Kar

U.S. Pressure on Pakistan's Leadership: Leaked Cable Revelations

August 10, 2023

Implications and Political Turmoil Unveiled


Unveiling Intricate Dynamics and Political Fallout


Recent revelations from classified Pakistani government documents obtained by the intercept shed light on the extent of U.S. pressure to remove prime minister Imran khan from power. The documents reveal that the U.S. state department encouraged the Pakistani government to oust khan due to his perceived neutrality on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The following key points emerge from the leaked cable and related events:


Diplomatic meeting and U.S. push: In a meeting on march 7, 2022, between Pakistani ambassador Asad Majeed khan and U.S. officials, including assistant secretary of state for south and central Asian affairs Donald Lu, the U.S. expressed concerns about Pakistan's stance on the Ukraine crisis. Lu conveyed that European and U.S. concerns arose due to khan's perceived neutral stance, which was seen as inconsistent. Lu hinted that if a no-confidence vote against khan succeeded, all would be forgiven by Washington, indicating a potential change in relations.


U.S. reactions and consequences: the cable documented Lu's assertion that khan's removal would improve U.S.-Pakistan relations, while his continuation could lead to isolation by western allies. Lu indicated that khan's visit to Moscow during the Russian invasion of Ukraine had negatively impacted ties between Pakistan, Europe, and the U.S.


Khan's response and political context: Khan addressed the public's concerns about Pakistan's neutrality in the Ukraine crisis, emphasizing the country's independence and refusal to align with any alliance. He defended Pakistan's position as a result of thorough interagency consultations, indicating that his public remarks were a reaction to European ambassadors' public criticism.


No-confidence vote and political developments: Approximately one month after the diplomatic meeting, a no-confidence vote was held in Pakistan's parliament, resulting in khan's removal from power. This vote was reportedly supported by Pakistan's influential military. Khan and his supporters accused the military of orchestrating his removal at the U.S.'s behest, sparking a political struggle between the military and khan's allies.


U.S. denials and Pakistani military crackdown: The U.S. state department has denied allegations of interfering in Pakistan's internal political matters. Khan's ousting has led to a significant crackdown by the Pakistani military on civil society and dissent, with thousands detained and press freedom curtailed.


Shift in foreign policy: Khan's removal has resulted in a shift in Pakistan's foreign policy, with the country aligning more closely with the U.S. and Europe on the Ukraine conflict. Pakistan's stance on Ukraine has shifted from neutrality to supplying arms to Ukraine and increased military cooperation.


Importance of the cable: The cable documents suggest U.S. encouragement for khan's removal. While the U.S. denied interfering in P internal affairs, the leaked cable provides insight into U.S. priorities and concerns.


Khan's legal troubles and diplomatic fallout: Khan has faced legal troubles related to discussing the cable publicly, and his legal team has suggested that the U.S. was manipulated by the Pakistani military. The cable has contributed to the ongoing political turmoil and uncertainty in Pakistan.


U.S.-Pakistani relations and military dominance: The U.S. Government's historical relationship with Pakistan's military has led to perceptions of interference and hindered the nation's growth and independence. The cable's contents highlight the complex dynamics between Pakistan's leadership and the U.S.


Ongoing impact: The leaked cable, khan's removal, and the subsequent crackdown on dissent have had profound effects on Pakistan's political, economic, and social landscapes, contributing to instability and concerns about democratic backsliding.


The leaked cable and its revelations continue to generate debates about U.S. involvement in Pakistan’s internal politics, the role of the military, and the challenges of maintaining a balance between democratic governance and military influence.


Asghar Kamal Butt

10/08/2023




Comments


bottom of page